Penile Implant Surgical Practice Model

KEY FEATURES

Complete IPP workflow in one integrated training platform

24 integrated anatomical structures with pelvic and retropubic landmarks

Corporotomy, dilatation, measurement, cylinder, pump and blind reservoir placement

Reusable torso-pelvic module with replaceable penile component

Designed for standard IPP devices and commonly used surgical instruments

Category:

Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation is a technically demanding procedure with limited opportunities for structured hands-on training. This validated full-procedure simulator integrates penile, scrotal, abdominal, pelvic and retropubic anatomy, enabling rehearsal of the operative workflow from corporotomy and corporal dilatation through cylinder, pump and blind reservoir placement.

 

WHAT CAN BE PRACTISED

Corporotomy and corporal exposure

Corporal dilatation, measurement and error inspection

Cylinder insertion and corporotomy closure

Scrotal pump and blind reservoir placement

TRAINING SETTINGS

Prosthetic urology workshops and courses

Simulation centres and skills laboratories

Supervised small-group teaching

Trainee skills development and refreshers

EDUCATIONAL VALUE

Rehearse the complete operative workflow before live patient exposure

Develop 3D anatomical orientation for reservoir placement

Standardised, repeatable full-procedure training

Cadaveric assessment showed higher performance after simulator training

 

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Procedure: Full inflatable penile prosthesis implantation

System: Reusable torso-pelvic module with replaceable penile module

Anatomy: 24 integrated penile, scrotal, abdominal, pelvic, inguinal and retropubic structures

Reservoir training: Blind placement with pubic tubercle, inguinal canal and bladder landmarks

Construction: Tissue-mimicking elastomers with 3D-printed structural elements

INTENDED TRAINING APPLICATION

Complete IPP implantation rehearsal

Corporal preparation, measurement and cylinder placement

Pump and blind reservoir placement

Recognition of corporal perforation and crossover

Instructor-led prosthetic urology training

 

VALIDATION HIGHLIGHTS

4.75 vs 3.48

OVERALL PPAT PERFORMANCE

Mean scores on the 5-point competency scale.

4.47 vs 3.67

OVERALL CONFIDENCE

Mean self-reported confidence after cadaveric IPP surgery.

26.5 vs 32.0 min

PROCEDURAL TIME

Mean corporotomy-to-closure time.

Preliminary fresh-frozen cadaveric assessment: simulator-trained vs untrained participants (final assessed n=4).

 

Manuals and Technical Sheets:

Technical Sheet – Click here to download the Technical Sheet

Related Products

Scroll to Top